Laravel: A Full-Stack Framework Reflection
After months with Laravel 5.6, I had built complete applications — Blade UIs, REST APIs, email, SMS, background jobs. A reflection on what Laravel taught me about web development, and why it prepared me for everything that came after.
The Journey So Far
When I started with Laravel in early 2019, I was a PHP developer writing spaghetti code. Months later, I had built real applications:
- User authentication with roles and permissions
- Beautiful Blade UIs with layouts and components
- Email notifications that actually looked professional
- SMS alerts for critical events
- REST APIs consumed by mobile apps
- Background jobs processing thousands of tasks
Looking back, Laravel didn’t just teach me a framework. It taught me how modern web applications work.
What Laravel Got Right
Convention Over Configuration
Laravel has opinions. Controllers go here. Models go there. Routes work this way.
At first, this felt restrictive. “Why can’t I organize my code MY way?”
But those conventions meant:
- Any Laravel developer could understand my project
- I spent time building features, not debating folder structures
- Best practices were built into the framework
When I moved to other frameworks later, I appreciated having learned conventions first.
The Ecosystem
Need authentication? make:auth.
Need an API? api.php routes.
Need emails? Mailable classes.
Need background jobs? Queue workers.
Need caching? Cache::remember().
Laravel had an answer for everything. Not always the BEST answer, but a WORKING answer. I could prototype quickly and optimize later.
Documentation
Laravel’s documentation is genuinely excellent. Clear examples. Explained concepts. Updated regularly.
I learned more from the Laravel docs than from most programming books. When a framework’s documentation is this good, learning becomes enjoyable.
The Community
Laracasts, Laravel News, countless tutorials, active forums. When I got stuck, someone had already solved it.
The community wasn’t just helpful — it was welcoming. No “RTFM” attitudes. People actually wanted to help newcomers.
What I Struggled With
Eloquent Magic
Eloquent is beautiful until it isn’t. Simple queries are elegant:
User::where('active', true)->orderBy('name')->get();
Complex queries become confusing:
User::whereHas('orders', function ($query) {
$query->where('status', 'completed')
->whereYear('created_at', date('Y'));
})->withCount(['orders' => function ($query) {
$query->where('status', 'completed');
}])->having('orders_count', '>', 5)->get();
At some point, raw SQL would have been clearer. Learning when to use Eloquent vs. raw queries took time.
The “Laravel Way” vs. Reality
Laravel tutorials show happy paths. Real projects have:
- Legacy databases with terrible schemas
- Third-party APIs with weird requirements
- Business logic that doesn’t fit MVC cleanly
- Performance requirements that demand optimization
Laravel handles edge cases, but finding HOW required digging beyond basic tutorials.
Deployment Complexity
Running Laravel locally is easy. Running it in production needs:
- Proper PHP version
- Required extensions (mbstring, openssl, etc.)
- Correct file permissions
- Queue workers with Supervisor
- Scheduled tasks with cron
- Cache configuration
- Environment variables
My first deployment took a full day of debugging. The next one took an hour. Experience matters.
Patterns I Learned (That Applied Everywhere)
MVC Architecture
Before Laravel, I mixed everything. After Laravel, I instinctively separated:
- Data (Models)
- Logic (Controllers/Services)
- Presentation (Views)
This pattern appears in every framework. Learning it once in Laravel made React, Spring Boot, and everything else easier.
Service Layer Pattern
Controllers should be thin. Business logic should live in services.
// Bad: Fat controller
public function store(Request $request)
{
// 100 lines of validation, business logic, notifications...
}
// Good: Thin controller, fat service
public function store(Request $request, OrderService $orderService)
{
$order = $orderService->create($request->validated());
return redirect('/orders/' . $order->id);
}
This pattern made my code testable, reusable, and understandable.
Repository Pattern
I didn’t always use it, but understanding it helped:
// Direct Eloquent
$users = User::where('active', true)->get();
// Repository
$users = $this->userRepository->getActive();
Repositories abstract data access. When I needed to switch from MySQL to an API, having repositories made it possible.
Event-Driven Architecture
Laravel’s events and listeners taught me to think differently:
// Instead of
public function store(Request $request)
{
$order = Order::create($request->validated());
Mail::send(new OrderConfirmation($order));
$this->analytics->track('order_created', $order);
$this->inventory->update($order);
}
// Think in events
public function store(Request $request)
{
$order = Order::create($request->validated());
event(new OrderCreated($order)); // Listeners handle the rest
}
Decoupling through events made features easier to add and remove.
The Tools That Stuck With Me
Artisan CLI
The idea of a framework-specific CLI seemed weird at first. Now I miss it in frameworks that don’t have one.
php artisan make:model Product -mcr # Model, migration, controller, resource
php artisan tinker # Interactive shell
php artisan route:list # See all routes
Generating boilerplate with commands beats copy-pasting from old files.
Migrations
Version-controlled database schemas. Revolutionary for someone who used to modify databases via phpMyAdmin.
When I moved to other stacks, I immediately looked for migration tools. The concept transferred perfectly.
Environment Configuration
.env files for secrets. Config files for structure. Environment-specific behavior without code changes.
This pattern appears in every modern framework. Learning it in Laravel made everything else familiar.
What Laravel Prepared Me For
React/Frontend Frameworks
When I learned React, components felt familiar. Blade’s @include and @component had already taught me to think in reusable pieces.
Spring Boot/Java Backend
When I moved to Spring Boot, concepts translated:
- Routes → Controllers with
@GetMapping - Eloquent → JPA/MyBatis
- Artisan → Maven/Gradle commands
.env→application.properties
Different syntax, same patterns.
API Design
Building APIs in Laravel taught me REST principles, status codes, resource transformation, authentication. These applied identically in every backend framework I touched after.
DevOps Basics
Deploying Laravel taught me:
- Linux server basics
- Process management (Supervisor)
- Cron jobs
- Environment variables
- Log management
These skills transferred to any deployment, any framework.
Would I Use Laravel Today?
For certain projects, absolutely:
- Content sites with some dynamic features
- Admin dashboards
- MVPs that need to ship fast
- Projects where the team knows PHP
For API-only backends with React/Vue frontends, I’d consider:
- Node.js (same language as frontend)
- Go (performance-critical)
- Spring Boot (enterprise requirements)
Laravel’s strength is full-stack development. If you need Blade templates AND an API AND background jobs AND everything else, it’s hard to beat.
The Real Lesson
Laravel taught me that frameworks are tools, not identities.
I’m not a “Laravel developer” or a “React developer.” I’m a developer who uses the right tool for the job.
Laravel was my first real framework. It gave me patterns, principles, and confidence. When I moved to React for frontends and Spring Boot for certain backends, I wasn’t starting over. I was applying the same concepts in different syntax.
The best thing Laravel did was prepare me to learn anything else.
What’s Next
After this Laravel journey, I wanted to explore the frontend more deeply. JavaScript frameworks were exploding. React was everywhere.
Time to see what the other side of the stack looked like.
P.S. — If you’re starting web development and unsure what to learn, I’d still recommend Laravel. Not because it’s the “best” framework, but because it teaches you how web applications work. The patterns you learn will serve you in any stack, any language, any framework. And you’ll ship real applications while learning. That’s the best way to grow.
Saurav Sitaula
Software Architect • Nepal